Paul stated that Burning Man was based in the Cacophony Soc and anarchy to condone his actions.
Despite my personal feelings on the matter I do respect Paul honesty, bravery and albeit humor, in the face of imminent punishment.
Despite my personal feelings on the matter I do respect Paul honesty, bravery and albeit humor, in the face of imminent punishment.
posted by:
|
SF Bay Area
|
-
Re: Cacophony Defense
Sat, June 28, 2008 - 11:48 AMI'm actually glad the Cacophony defense has not actually worked in a Court of law yet. Right up there with Twinkies, Diminished Capacity and the glove that does not fit.
But Addis didn't really test it, having plead guilty and all. -
-
Re: Cacophony Defense
Sat, June 28, 2008 - 11:52 AMIt was a sentencing not a hearing. -
-
-
Re: Cacophony Defense
Wed, July 2, 2008 - 8:21 AMCacophony LLC should present all the receipts for the costs of starting Burning Man to BM LLC for restitution, now that BMorg are convicted of 'Being Not Funny, On Purpose, In Front of Everyone". A Class A Felony. -
-
Re: Cacophony Defense
Mon, July 7, 2008 - 2:02 PM"Cacophony LLC should present all the receipts for the costs of starting Burning Man to BM LLC for restitution"
Yea, no shit. that would be funny... -
-
Re: Cacophony Defense
Tue, July 8, 2008 - 2:53 PMActually, there is a trademark of Cacophony. There is an owner. That you don't know who it is means he's the right guy for the job.
Buy me a bourbon and I'll tell you who it is. -
-
Re: Cacophony Defense
Tue, July 8, 2008 - 4:00 PM -
-
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
-
-
-
-
Re: Cacophony Defense
Mon, July 14, 2008 - 8:27 PMWell ... someone has to take charge of these things ... -
-
Re: Cacophony Defense
Thu, August 7, 2008 - 1:54 PMM2 is correct. He will likely pass it on to John Voldol when he dies...
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
