They're all sheep

topic posted Thu, September 13, 2007 - 1:51 AM by 

90% of the people out there are just sheep, and they do exactly what they're told.

For far too long, the BMORG has usurped power from the Cacophanists who moved the event out to the playa. They've been gradually setting more and more of a tone of structure and order. And the sheep have just been happily following along with that.

How about if we change the tone? We need to stop letting the BMORG set the lead at Burningman, and set a lead of our own. If a critical mass of us go and and spread _disorder_ next year, many others will undoubtedly pick up and follow our lead.

What sort of chaos and disorder can we spread at Burningman next year?
posted by:
  • Re: They're all sheep

    Thu, September 13, 2007 - 9:25 AM
    "What sort of chaos and disorder can we spread at Burningman next year?"

    My continued absence will be construed as the prime sign of the End of Days. Women will rend their clothes and men will weep. A harsh wind will blow across the desert, scouring the suvs, tearing the blue tarp and disrupting the drum circles. Armed thugs will walk free, capriciously dealing out playa justice, levying draconian punishments on those too slow to hide. A charismatic leader will vacantly pontificate about something he read in Readers Digest, then force the populace to cooperate in the most banal of art crimes. CNN will do a 90 second report.


    Just like last year.
  • Re: They're all sheep

    Thu, September 13, 2007 - 11:04 AM
    Why don't you bring a truckload of ACTUAL sheep to BM next year.


    And then set them on fire.


    Think of the delicious mutton that can be enjoyed afterwards! Mmmm! Art AND dinner! THAT is radical self-reliance.
  • Re: They're all sheep

    Thu, September 13, 2007 - 11:54 AM
    I have visions of arming the first oh I don't don't know, let's say 1000 women at Crtitcal Tits with super-soakers (or flamethrowers, perhaps? No, too expensive). Let the creepy-guy camera carnage begin! Now, I'm a raging feminist or anything, but really...

    Thought about coming in a burka this year, but supersoakers would be much more fun, and let's face it, burkas are HOT (not in the Paris Hilton way).

    Anyone up for Take Back the Titties?
    • Re: They're all sheep

      Thu, September 13, 2007 - 4:05 PM
      I was unaware the Titties were in need of Takin'.


      Seriously, I do avoid Critical Tits 'cuz I know it'll just be a sea of telephoto lenses and hard-ons.

      I like how you are thinking, but be prepared for an angry/violent reaction when water ruins someone's (expensive) camera.
      • Re: They're all sheep

        Thu, September 13, 2007 - 6:46 PM
        So how 'bout putting out warnings in all the porta potties, starting monday-best way to get the word out I know of. Bring your camera at your own risk...Does take the some of the fun out it though. Maybe just some warning shots at the get go would suffice...
        • Re: They're all sheep

          Thu, September 13, 2007 - 10:41 PM
          I'm very anti-nonconsentual photography at burningman, but unfortunately I don't know of an effective (yet legal) method to stop it.

          Some warning shots (shot by intimidating folks) might be effective for those up close and personal. But those with the "Girls Gone Wild"-sized telephoto lenses...the ones that you never see....
          • Re: They're all sheep

            Fri, September 14, 2007 - 12:56 AM
            True enough, but I think the idea is to express disatisfaction w/ the status quo through means of playful prank, rather than the org having to make yet another "rule" for the sheep to follow (getting back to the posted topic). Not so much the destruction of *every* camera. Tho if it were my BM to run I would say flamethrowers to the GGW cameras...
          • Re: They're all sheep

            Fri, September 14, 2007 - 1:51 AM
            Have someone with a bullhorn shouting "if a camera is pointed at me it will get super-soaked" that should keep the well-meaning folk safe. Then next year the pros will have scuba shells on their cameras.
            • Unsu...
               

              Re: They're all sheep

              Fri, September 14, 2007 - 3:50 AM
              How about paper tops that completely cover all tits printed with, "Your Camera is Ruining this Event."

              Sacrifice Critical Tits one year to make the statement.
              • Re: They're all sheep

                Fri, September 14, 2007 - 8:45 AM
                Simple. Beautiful. I love it. 'Cept supersoakers are more satisfying...
                • Re: They're all sheep

                  Fri, September 14, 2007 - 1:36 PM
                  Supersoakers are waaaay more satisfyig (and you'll never get enough people to go along with the paper tops to make it an effective statement).

                  There are many surly people at burningman who don't like all the photogs. And many of them have bullhorns. And 'soakers are easy to obtain. I think it would be possible to get a big enough gang to "police" the event.


                  I also saw a photo (either here or on flickr), and it was of a topless woman with, "STOP TAKING PICTURES OF MY TITS!" written across her chest.

                  I don't know if the photog who took the picture was a friend of the woman, doing it out of defiance, etc. But it might have made a few people think (or at least not bother).
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: They're all sheep

                    Fri, February 15, 2008 - 1:47 PM
                    I coming into this thread way late, but I have to say, I love the supersoaker idea. I have so many female friends who are just sick of CT. It used to be a women empowerment event. Now they feel it's the perv event of the week. I have a few friends who would ride up to the worst looking pervs and smear a bit of vaseline on their camera lenses. Got an expensive camera? Tough shit. Hey, when you enter BM you agree to not take pictures unless you ask first. Soak away.
  • Re: They're all sheep

    Fri, September 14, 2007 - 2:07 PM
    How about building 5 life size replica's of the man? Each put in a different location of the playa.

    Then burn one each night (but be careful of the yahoo's trying to burn it down when you are least ready!)
    • Re: They're all sheep

      Fri, September 14, 2007 - 2:53 PM
      We discussed that about ten years ago. Not five, but a much, much bigger one. But that wouldn't have gotten the message across. It would have just further glorified a corporate logo.
      • Re: They're all sheep

        Fri, September 14, 2007 - 2:55 PM
        >>We discussed that about ten years ago. Not five, but a much, much bigger one.

        Oooh! Get out those rulers and see whose "man" is bigger? Love it.
      • Re: They're all sheep

        Fri, September 14, 2007 - 8:30 PM
        FireChild:
        > I have visions of arming the first oh I don't don't know, let's say 1000 women at Crtitcal Tits with super-soakers (or flamethrowers, perhaps? No, too expensive).

        I have a thousand dollar camera (including lens) which I've used to take photos all over the world, so I don't find that so funny.

        margaret:
        > Not five, but a much, much bigger one. But that wouldn't have gotten the message across. It would have just further glorified a corporate logo.

        How about a massive pig, monkey, sheep or something else?

        What about a huge man fucking a donkey?

        Reecy:
        > Why don't you bring a truckload of ACTUAL sheep to BM next year.
        > And then set them on fire.

        Hahahaha....

        I _love_ it. It's the new bacon.

        Roasting whole sheep is certainly one way to keep the hippies away.

        What do you think that Gate crew would do if someone showed up with a flatbed full of live sheep?

        Is there a moop issue?
        • Re: They're all sheep

          Sat, September 15, 2007 - 10:55 AM
          I have a thousand dollar camera (including lens) which I've used to take photos all over the world, so I don't find that so funny.

          Then I suggest you put it away for CT next year...I would really hate to see it get ruined ;o)
          • Re: They're all sheep

            Sun, September 16, 2007 - 11:59 PM
            This may be a fairly bad first impression, but oh well.

            Seems there's still at least a touch of bad feelings between CS and BM (or at least the people in charge), which is understandable, considering the past; a past I have only read about and won't claim to actually "know". Please don't kill me with the history books if I misunderstood something.

            In any case, There some actions that could take place in order to sort of make the most of the situation, or possibly avoid it, including some already mentioned that I'd like to expand on:

            - This suggestion to rally against the establishment of BRC. Seems simple enough, really. Encourage rule-bending around the outskirts of the city, which could lead into arranging flash mobs for random pranks, and at the stroke of 3am on Tuesday morning of BM 2008, assemble a group around the Man in Addis facepaint and chant the following (due to the link drawn between Addis and Fawkes):

            Remember, remember, that night in September
            (Or wait, was it August or not?)
            I say without malice the actions of Addis
            Should never be forgot.

            Hold up lighters for that added "oh shit" effect. Or burn a tiny man, then put it out with a watergun.

            Speaking of which, what if, instead of the watergun idea for CT, everyone brings cans of silly string (one better, those Spider-Man web shooters with crude Spidey masks and referring to every woman as Mary Jane)? It won't damage the camera, but it WILL prevent them from taking pics when they have gunked-up lenses, and it'll be a bitch to clean off if they don't take immediate action. I imagine that stuff would dry out pretty fast in the desert...

            Also, "Run For The Border" is a must.

            - The suggestion to start another event. While I can understand the "burn me twice" logic, what if this imaginary event were private and secret? A "we do NOT talk about Fight Club" kind of deal, but actually mean it. As I understand, that's what started to drive the wedge, was it not; the urge to keep the crazy desert festivities to the inner circle, and Harvey's insitance of "bring the kids!"? Another time, another place, and on your own terms. 100% Cacophonist made.

            You may get accused of being a rip-off, but that'd just be by twits who don't know how to read up on the things they're arguing about. Or, roll with it, forming a mini gathering just outside BM. Stake a sign at your border: "Piss off, hippies. We were here first."

            - With considerably less effort, how about just crashing someone else's party? www.shambhalamusicfestival.com I have heard this event described as "Shambhala is B.C.’s Burning Man, but in the forest instead of a desert."

            Perhaps a bit too rave-ish, and not exactly an experiment in radical self-reliance, but it'd probably be pretty easy to rattle a few cages in a new group. That's the important thing, right?

            - Ultimately, why not just forget about the whole mess (as I understand some of you already do)? Fuck it. Put your time and energy into something else. If the event is such a disgrace from the orignal incarnation, then why bother?

            From things I've seen and read, the place is overflowing with yuppies that want to be like you, but can't. They wouldn't appreciate (read: be mind-fucked by) your antics.

            Blame my youthful ignorance if this all seems incredibly stupid. It's some stuff that came to mind as I was a-browsin' the threads.

            Thoughts?
            • Re: They're all sheep

              Mon, September 17, 2007 - 12:38 AM
              Monroe:

              All well said. Some comments.

              I've had enough of fighting against the BMORG. I'll try to give advice to the best of my ability, but I think that it's time that we instead take a leading role and add some pranks and cacophony back into the event.

              > at the stroke of 3am on Tuesday morning of BM 2008, assemble a group around the Man in Addis facepaint and chant the following (due to the link drawn between Addis and Fawkes):

              I'd prefer if this could somehow be scheduled at the same time as run for the border as I love the idea of dividing the rangers attention. Maybe we could make some sort of compromise on the times.

              Your poem is nice, but is a bit hard to remember and doesn't flow off the tongue easy enough.

              How about something more to the point:

              "Paul's the man"
              "Burn baby burn"

              And I don't think that lighters make enough of a statement. I see the march bit more like this:

              www.web-strategist.com/blog/w...gry.gif

              www.confusionroad.com/article.../mob.jpg

              img.photobucket.com/albums/v...G8728.jpg

              The rangers and BMORG won't know if we're going to set the man on fire or not. Neither will we. But if some person(s) happen to toss their torches on the man, so be it.

              I'd love to see the court case - "your honor, the clown did it."

              Defense - "which clown??"
        • Unsu...
           

          I like it the other way!

          Wed, December 5, 2007 - 4:03 PM
          >What about a huge man fucking a donkey? <

          Wouldn't it be funnier if the donkey was fucking the Man? Ala Tijuana donkey show?
  • Re: They're all sheep

    Wed, September 19, 2007 - 12:23 AM
    I say we commandeer a thumpity-thump techno dome and play FOLK music, or better yet sea shanties....

    Does anyone do a good Leonard Cohen, Burl Ives or even early Bobby Dylan ?

    I heard there was a Neil Young Camp this year- Never found my way there though....

    The lack of live music over the 24 hour non-stop thumping is silly.
    • Re: They're all sheep

      Wed, September 19, 2007 - 12:50 AM
      How about some B-52s?

      If some sort of live music thing could be set up, I'd be in for it. I may be able to convince a nusician or two that I know to join in.
      • Re: They're all sheep

        Wed, September 19, 2007 - 9:10 AM
        You have to have music that is completely unpsychedelic if you want to bother the tweakers. I've had the most glares from cranking up the Motorhead. Punk rock is very good too. Oh, and southern rock they dont reconize.
        • Unsu...
           

          Re: They're all sheep

          Wed, September 19, 2007 - 10:45 AM
          There's a seven-eleven not far from my house that has succeeded in eliminating tweaker panhandlers by playing non-stop classical out of speakers outside of the shop.
      • Re: They're all sheep

        Wed, September 19, 2007 - 11:59 AM

        I don't know how we could take over the DJ stand, and play our own music.

        But it should be easy enough to knock out the power at any step along it's chain from the generator to the amps.

        Once the power was out, live music could be done in it's place.

        But if the power goes out, so do the lights. How could we best use that to our advantage?
        • Re: They're all sheep

          Wed, September 19, 2007 - 1:55 PM
          >>But if the power goes out, so do the lights. How could we best use that to our advantage?

          Same way Batman does: kick the snot out of everyone under the cover of dark, then run away shouting "I am the night!" Or, we could use it to scatter ourselves amongst the crowd for some follow-up pranking. I imagine it wouldn't take them long to get power back out there.

          What if we disconnected the feed from the two turntables and the microphone and just plugged in our own CD player or something? Put some crazy glue on the back end of the jack so it can't be removed without some effort.
          • Re: They're all sheep

            Wed, September 19, 2007 - 2:01 PM
            When the movie Earthquake came out, they had a machine installed in the theaters that would shake the building. What if we just had a device that would send out a heavy beat that was not in time with the raver music? Would that be disconcerting enough?
            • Re: They're all sheep

              Wed, September 19, 2007 - 10:30 PM
              >>What if we just had a device that would send out a heavy beat that was not in time with the raver music? Would that be disconcerting enough?

              If we got a large enough sub woofer and placed it directly against some surface of their setup (stage, wall, dancefloor, whatever they have), it's technically possible to tune to the resonant frequency of the place and give them a good shake-down. So long as they're not too grounded, anyway.